Manual Platelet Count Vs Automated Platelet Count. Platelet count of every sample was done by peripheral blood smear and by mindray (bc5150) automated cell counter, simultaneously.results: The mean of the automated platelet levels was approximately 76 × 10 9 /l with the standard deviation of 45;
Figure 1 from Platelet count correlation automated versus manual on from www.semanticscholar.org
We evaluated the performance of automated platelet counts and their relation to clinical bleeding. Automated versus manual platelet count in aden. Platelet counts can be done manually with a commercial diluting system, hemocytometer, and a microscope.
The Mean Of The Automated Platelet Levels Was Approximately 76 × 10 9 /L With The Standard Deviation Of 45;
Secondly, we compared triplicate automated and manual platelet counts on. Platelet count of every sample was done by peripheral blood smear and by mindray (bc5150) automated cell counter, simultaneously.results: While the manual platelet count results was 170 × 10 9 /l with the standard.
We Evaluated The Performance Of Automated Platelet Counts And Their Relation To Clinical Bleeding.
Platelet counts can be done manually with a commercial diluting system, hemocytometer, and a microscope. The mean platelet count, of the cases under study, given by the automated analyzer was significantly lower than the mean platelet count estimated by manual method (p < 0>. Results by manual slide method are.
These Counts Are Less Accurate Than Automated Counts,.
The manual method for performing platelet count estimates on blood. Automated versus manual platelet count in aden. The specimens were processed by the automated method and the manual method simultaneously.
